1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |