1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio. 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
