1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (508 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 375 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 508 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
