1974 Citroen Ami vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1974 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1974 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen Ami | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 65 L |