1974 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1974 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 573 kg more than 1974 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen Ami | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ami | Mustang |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2580 mm |