1974 Citroen Ami vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,307 cc, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1974 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1974 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen Ami | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1307 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 61 L |