1974 Citroen CX vs. 1968 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1974 Citroen CX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1968 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen CX weights approximately 55 kg more than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (161 Nm). This means 1968 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Citroen CX | 1968 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Citroen | NSU |
| Model | CX | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 37 L |
