1974 Citroen CX vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1974 Citroen CX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Citroen CX (95 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen CX weights approximately 665 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | CX | 850 K |
Year Released | 1974 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2010 mm |