1974 Citroen CX vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 1979 Mazda 929 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Citroen CX (95 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen CX weights approximately 285 kg more than 1979 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Citroen CX (216 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 929 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |