1974 Citroen CX vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen CX weights approximately 346 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1974 Citroen CX has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1974 Citroen CX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | CX | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1974 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1910 mm |