1974 Citroen CX vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Citroen CX (95 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen CX weights approximately 554 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Citroen CX (216 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1974 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | Midge |
Year Released | 1974 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |