1974 Citroen CX vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (150 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1974 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1974 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | CX | FTO |
Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 202 Nm |
Top Speed | 147 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |