1974 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (95 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen CX weights approximately 312 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Citroen CX (216 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1974 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1974 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1974 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Citroen CX | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | CX | Equator |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3260 mm |
