1974 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen CX weights approximately 57 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |