1974 Citroen CX vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (95 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 359 kg more than 1974 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (216 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | CX | Ram |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 408 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3530 mm |