1974 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX. 2004 Mazda MX has automatic transmission and 1974 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1974 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda MX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | MX |
Year Released | 1974 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |