1974 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (95 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (216 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | CX | Ram |
Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |