1974 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1974 Citroen CX. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen CX.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC90 (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen CX | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | CX | XC90 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2650 mm |