1974 Citroen Dyane vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen Dyane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen Dyane would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1974 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen Dyane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen Dyane. (29 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen Dyane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Citroen Dyane | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Dyane | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 423 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 29 Nm | 269 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 76 L |
