1974 Citroen GS vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1974 Citroen GS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1974 Citroen GS. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 66 kg more than 1974 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen GS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen GS | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GS | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | boxer | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 94 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.4:1 |
Top Speed | 153 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 874 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2210 mm |