1974 Citroen GS vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen GS would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1974 Citroen GS. (59 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 401 kg more than 1974 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Citroen GS | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | GS | Puma |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65.5 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Top Speed | 153 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 874 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |
