1974 Citroen GS vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen GS would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1974 Citroen GS. (59 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 436 kg more than 1974 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen GS | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GS | 3 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65.5 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 153 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 874 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |