1974 Citroen GS vs. 2007 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen GS would be higher. At 3,517 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1974 Citroen GS. (59 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1469 kg more than 1974 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen GS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1974 Citroen GS has manual transmission. 1974 Citroen GS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen GS | 2007 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | GS | Charger |
Year Released | 1974 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 3517 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 874 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3050 mm |