1974 Citroen SM vs. 1950 Holden FX

To start off, 1974 Citroen SM is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Citroen SM (170 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Citroen SM weights approximately 480 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1974 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: