1974 Citroen SM vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen SM would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1974 Citroen SM. (170 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1974 Citroen SM.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Citroen SM. (237 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen SM | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | SM | Tundra |
Year Released | 1974 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 45 L |