1974 Citroen SM vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Citroen SM (170 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Volvo V50. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo V50.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Citroen SM (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo V50. (231 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1974 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Citroen SM | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | SM | V50 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 2345 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 231 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 62 L |