1974 DAF 66 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 380 kg more than 1974 DAF 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1974 DAF 66 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 66 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 68 L |