1974 DAF 66 vs. 2006 Mazda 6

To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1974 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1974 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 301 kg more than 1974 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 DAF 66.

Compare all specifications: