1974 DAF 66 vs. 2009 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 DAF 66 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Acadia (284 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1974 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1974 DAF 66.
Because 1974 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 GMC Acadia (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1974 DAF 66 | 2009 GMC Acadia | |
Make | DAF | GMC |
Model | 66 | Acadia |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 83 L |