1974 DAF 66 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1974 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1974 DAF 66.
Because 1974 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1974 DAF 66 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 66 | 6 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1850 mm |