1974 DAF 66 vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 DAF 66 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1974 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1974 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1136 kg more than 1974 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 DAF 66 | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 66 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 1964 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 76 L |
