1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 1974 Datsun 260Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 85 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1974 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Datsun 260Z | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Datsun | Volvo |
| Model | 260Z | 220 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2565 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4135 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
