1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 85 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 1974 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Datsun 260Z | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Datsun | Proton |
Model | 260Z | 300 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2581 mm | 2450 mm |