1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1974 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1974 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 525 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1974 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Datsun 260Z | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Datsun | Lotus |
Model | 260Z | M250 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 180 Nm |
Top Speed | 204 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2581 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |