1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 165 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1974 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Datsun 260Z | 2002 Ford Puma | |
Make | Datsun | Ford |
Model | 260Z | Puma |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2581 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |