1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1974 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1974 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1222 kg more than 1974 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Datsun 260Z | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Datsun | Ford |
Model | 260Z | E-350 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2581 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |