1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1974 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1974 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1174 kg more than 1974 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Datsun 260Z | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Datsun | Nissan |
Model | 260Z | Armada |
Year Released | 1974 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4135 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 106 L |