1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (180 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1974 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1974 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 66 kg more than 2005 Toyota Celica.
Because 1974 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Celica. (176 Nm). This means 1974 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Datsun 260Z | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Datsun | Toyota |
Model | 260Z | Celica |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 1803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2581 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |