1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Datsun 260Z (163 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2008 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1974 Datsun 260Z has manual transmission. 1974 Datsun 260Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Datsun 260Z | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Datsun | Ford |
| Model | 260Z | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2565 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2581 mm | 2490 mm |
