1974 Datsun 260Z vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Datsun 260Z would be higher.
Because 1974 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Datsun 260Z | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Datsun | Nissan |
| Model | 260Z | Leaf |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2581 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
