1974 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 534 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1974 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Triumph |
Model | Longchamp | 2000 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |