1974 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 534 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 De Tomaso Longchamp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 De Tomaso Longchamp | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | De Tomaso | Mitsubishi |
Model | Longchamp | Dingo |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |