1974 Fiat 133 vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1982 Seat Ronda is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 1,193 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (61 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1974 Fiat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1974 Fiat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Seat Ronda weights approximately 210 kg more than 1974 Fiat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Fiat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Fiat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Seat Ronda (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Fiat 133 | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Fiat | Seat |
Model | 133 | Ronda |
Year Released | 1974 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 842 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 67.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2460 mm |