1974 Fiat 133 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1974 Fiat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1974 Fiat 133.
Because 1974 Fiat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Fiat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Fiat 133 | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Fiat | Volkswagen |
Model | 133 | Polo |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 842 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2470 mm |