1974 Fiat 133 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1974 Fiat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1974 Fiat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 528 kg more than 1974 Fiat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Fiat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Fiat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Fiat 133 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 133 | Clio |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 842 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.9:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2580 mm |