1974 Fiat 133 vs. 2012 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Rexton (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1974 Fiat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1974 Fiat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1282 kg more than 1974 Fiat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Fiat 133. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 SsangYong Rexton (345 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Fiat 133 | 2012 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Fiat | SsangYong |
| Model | 133 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 842 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 345 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.9:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2830 mm |
