1974 Ford Granada vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Ford Granada would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1974 Ford Granada. (74 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1974 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Ford Granada weights approximately 155 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 1974 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Ford Granada. (197 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Ford Granada | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Granada | CU-X |
Year Released | 1974 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3272 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2680 mm |