1974 Holden Belmont vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Belmont. (357 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Holden Belmont | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Belmont | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4141 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
