1974 Holden Belmont vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1974 Holden Belmont. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 361 kg more than 1974 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Belmont. (263 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Holden Belmont | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Holden | Lincoln |
Model | Belmont | LS |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3298 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 263 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |