1974 Holden Belmont vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Holden Belmont (239 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1974 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Holden Belmont | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | Belmont | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5042 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |
